top of page
  • Writer's pictureCell Cyber

Want the truth about your cyber risk? You need simulator-based training.



Most organisations rely on manual reviews and pen-testing to gauge cyber preparedness. But these approaches suffer from limited scale and artificiality. The resulting risk pictures lack fidelity.

Only full-scope simulations can reveal the ability to detect sophisticated threats and respond effectively. Realistic mock incidents are the litmus test. Here's why simulators are the new standard:

  • Massive scope - Simulators generate hundreds of parallel attacks across the enterprise. No manual test can match the scale and chaos.

  • Continuous cycling - Incidents run 24/7 over months, not one-off audits. Defenders must demonstrate stamina.

  • Maximum creativity - Algorithms create unpredictable, devious attacks. Humans can only do so much.

  • No compromise - Unlike audits, simulators play full-force offence. Deficiencies get exploited, not just noted.

  • Enterprise-wide - Simulators hit networks, applications, endpoints, clouds, OT. Every attack surface.

  • All scenarios - Ransomware, DDoS, spoofing, insider threats. Any technique imaginable gets deployed.

  • Real-world conditions - Fatigue, uncertainty, fear factor in. Stress testing reveals psychological resilience.

  • Automated benchmarking - Organisations compare results to industry peers. Blind spots become clear.

Without this level of intense, unscripted exposure, cyber risk assessments ring hollow. Defenders suffer false confidence when untested.

The high-fidelity insights are worth it. Simulators spotlight capability gaps, outdated assumptions and coverage blind spots. They show where to prioritise resources.

In our hyperconnected world, understanding true risk posture is paramount. Don't settle for check-list audits. Demand simulation-powered assessments. It's the only way to know defences will hold when the crisis strikes. And it will.


8 views0 comments
bottom of page